Confusion lingers over post-death insurance
SMSF Association head of education and technical Peter Hogan said questions lingered over practical issues in relation to post-death insurance.
These issues include reversionary versus binding death benefit nomination pensions and transfer balance cap credits, whether insurance proceeds are credited like ordinary income for administration and tax component purposes, and whether pensioners are likely to retain insurance after commencing an income stream.
“Whether it’s intended that insurance would be able to be added to a pension account but not be added against or be credited against a transfer balance cap has very much a question mark over it,” Hogan told delegates at the SMSF Association National Conference 2018 in Sydney last week.
“The alternative may well be that Treasury’s intention without spelling it out was insurance proceeds can only be credited to an accumulation account and can only be paid out as a death benefit lump sum and can’t be added to a death benefit pension account of assets.”
He said the issue needed resolving and there was clearly a difference between reversionary and non-reversionary pensions.
“We will be continuing to pursue that with Treasury to see if we can come up with some solutions to that and how insurance proceeds need to be sensibly dealt with going forward,” he noted.
By Malavika Santhebennur
22 Feb 2018